SKILLEMALL.ai

CB health

Run condition-based vault health diagnostics. 8 categories — schema compliance, orphan detection, link health, description quality, three-space boundaries, processing throughput, stale notes, MOC coherence. 3 modes — quick (schema+orphans+links), full (all 8), three-space (boundary violations only). Returns actionable FAIL/WARN/PASS report with specific fixes ranked by impact. Triggers on "/health", "check vault health", "maintenance report", "what needs fixing".

agenticnotetaking/arscontexta Claude Code author: agenticnotetaking MIT 2 files body ≈ 6 962 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com↗ analyzed 33 h ago

Run condition-based vault health diagnostics.

As a process B 78/100 · Nearly there — weak spots: inputs and preconditions

AnalyzerData and analyticsSecurityResearchtype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
C
85/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
95
Quality 40%
69
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
B
78/100
Nearly there
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Result and completion w 14
60
When it triggers w 12
70
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

What is at stake

Medium-severity findings: the skill is probably honest, but read what alarmed the scanner.

Broad scope medium severity

Below is the worst case for this category. The finding here is medium: the guard saw a sign, not a proof.

If you install

The skill asks for more than the task needs: broad tool access, credential environment variables, binaries. Every extra permission widens the damage from a mistake or a compromise.

For the author

Narrow allowed-tools and the variable list to the minimum; replace binaries with readable sources or scripts.

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
  2. The SKILL.md body is over 5,000 tokens: move reference detail into references/ and load it when needed.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 1

✓ No critical or high findings

Medium and low: 1
  • medium Broad scope meta-broad-allowed-tools SKILL.md:1
    Broad tool permissions pre-approved: Bash
    allowed-tools: Read Grep Glob Bash mcp__qmd__vector_search

Files scanned: 2. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")
  • warning body-long SKILL.md body ≈ 6962 tokens (recommended < 5000); move details to references/
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "generated_from"

Process rating: all ten parameters 78/100

  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 60Result and completion. Output format stated, no completion criterion
  • 70When it triggers. States when to use, but not when not to
  • 70Execution cost. Instruction body is 6962 tokens
  • 100Tools and files. Tools declared in frontmatter
  • 100Steps. 60 steps
  • 100Failures and branches. 1 branches, has a failure section
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Running it twice. Mutating operations check current state
  • 100Progress reporting. Reports progress

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +5Description quotes 4 example trigger phrases
  • +3Description length 467: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 36 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 60 items
  • +3Output format is stated explicitly
  • +4Has examples (25 code blocks)

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 69.