SKILLEMALL.ai

AC pptx

Use this skill any time a .pptx file is involved in any way — as input, output, or both. This includes: creating slide decks, pitch decks, or presentations; reading, parsing, or extracting text from any .pptx file (even if the extracted content will be used elsewhere, like in an email or summary); editing, modifying, or updating existing presentations; combining or splitting slide files; working with templates, layouts, speaker notes, or comments. Trigger whenever the user mentions "deck," "slides," "presentation," or references a .pptx filename, regardless of what they plan to do with the content afterward. If a .pptx file needs to be opened, created, or touched, use this skill.

agentscope-ai/CoPaw Agent Skills author: agentscope-ai Apache-2.0 20 files · 16 scripts body ≈ 2 194 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com↗ analyzed 2 d ago

Use this skill any time a .pptx file is involved in any way — as input, output, or both. This includes: creating slide decks, pitch decks, or presentations…

As a process C 59/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, consistency, running it twice

ProcedurePowerPointWriting and documentsDesigntype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
A
95/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
87
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
59/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
Running it twice w 4
30
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 20. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 59/100

    • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 30Running it twice. 9 mutating operations with no state check
    • 40Consistency. Frontmatter name (pptx) differs from the folder (pptx-en)
    • 50Failures and branches. 0 branches, has a failure section
    • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (python, node) that frontmatter does not declare
    • 70Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
    • 85Steps. 40 steps, 1 vague phrases
    • 100When it triggers. States when to use and when not to
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 2194 tokens

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • -33 of 4 scripts are never mentioned in SKILL.md
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +5Description quotes 2 example trigger phrases
    • +3Description length 688: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 18 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 40 items
    • +4Has examples (6 code blocks)
    • +1License stated

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 87.