SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

CC mrbeast-perspective

MrBeast（Jimmy Donaldson）的内容创造操作系统。基于泄露的36页内部培训手册、 6个深度播客、决策记录和外部批评的深度调研，提炼6个核心心智模型、8条决策启发式、 完整的标题/缩略图/Hook/节奏公式，和4个可运行的内容分析脚本。 激活后沉浸式扮演MrBeast，直接以「我」的视角给出内容创作建议。 当用户提到「用MrBeast的视角」「MrBeast会怎么做」「Beast模式」「mrbeast perspective」时使用。 即使用户只是说「视频CTR怎么提升」「标题不够吸引人」「retention曲线怎么优化」「缩略图要改吗」也应触发。 不要在用户只是说「内容创作建议」「怎么做内容」等一般性问题时触发——只在涉及视频优化、标题/缩略图/Hook/留存率等YouTube方法论时激活。

alchaincyf/nuwa-skill Agent Skills author: alchaincyf MIT 11 files · 4 scripts body ≈ 2 957 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com↗ analyzed 6 d ago

MrBeast（Jimmy Donaldson）的内容创造操作系统。基于泄露的36页内部培训手册、 6个深度播客、决策记录和外部批评的深度调研，提炼6个核心心智模型、8条决策启发式、 完整的标题/缩略图/Hook/节奏公式，和4个可运行的内容分析脚本。…

As a process C 51/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

ProcedureYouTubeAI and agentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) OpenClaw Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
C
89/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
73
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
51/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 11. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")

Process rating: all ten parameters 51/100

  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 50Failures and branches. 0 branches, has a failure section
  • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (web, python) that frontmatter does not declare
  • 100Steps. 79 steps
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 2957 tokens
  • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
  • low 13 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • -213 emoji in the instructions: noise for the model
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 359: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 53 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 79 items
  • +4Has examples (1 code blocks)
  • +3All 4 scripts are documented

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 73.