SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

BC x-mastery-mentor

$10K/hr级X/Twitter运营导师。基于Nicolas Cole、Dickie Bush、Sahil Bloom、Justin Welsh、 Dan Koe、Alex Hormozi六位顶级创作者的方法论 + X开源算法深度分析 + AI/科技赛道专精策略， 提炼6个核心心智模型、10条决策启发式、完整的选题-写作-增长操作手册。 通用方法论为底座，AI/科技赛道为专精。 当用户提到「X运营」「推特」「Twitter」「怎么写推文」「怎么涨粉」「X策略」「推特选题」「tweet」「thread」「X算法」时使用。 即使用户只是说「这条推文怎么写」「帮我想个X内容」「推特增长」「发推」「write a tweet」「X account」「grow on X」也应触发。

alchaincyf/nuwa-skill Agent Skills author: alchaincyf MIT 13 files body ≈ 2 124 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com↗ analyzed 6 d ago

$10K/hr级X/Twitter运营导师。基于Nicolas Cole、Dickie Bush、Sahil Bloom、Justin Welsh、 Dan Koe、Alex Hormozi六位顶级创作者的方法论 + X开源算法深度分析 + AI/科技赛道专精策略，…

As a process C 58/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

GeneratorSoftware developmentAI and agentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) OpenClaw Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
B
90/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
76
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
58/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 13. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")

Process rating: all ten parameters 58/100

  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 50Failures and branches. 0 branches, has a failure section
  • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
  • 100Steps. 27 steps
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 2124 tokens
  • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
  • low 10 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 341: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 22 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 27 items
  • +4Has examples (5 code blocks)
  • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (5 of 5)

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 76.