SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

BF cloud-security

Use when assessing cloud infrastructure for security misconfigurations, IAM privilege escalation paths, S3 public exposure, open security group rules, or IaC security gaps. Covers AWS, Azure, and GCP posture assessment with MITRE ATT&CK mapping.

alirezarezvani/claude-skills Agent Skills author: alirezarezvani MIT 3 files body ≈ 4 069 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com↗ analyzed 2 d ago

Use when assessing cloud infrastructure for security misconfigurations, IAM privilege escalation paths, S3 public exposure, open security group rules, or IaC…

As a process F 39/100 · Will not run — References files that are not bundled: ../incident-response/SKILL.md, ../threat-detection/SKILL.md, ../red-team/SKILL.md

AnalyzerAWSGoogle CloudAzureTerraformInfrastructuretype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) OpenClaw Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
B
87/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
93
Quality 40%
79
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
F
39/100
Will not run
References files that are not bundled: ../incident-response/SKILL.md, ../threat-detection/SKILL.md, ../red-team/SKILL.md
Tools and files w 18
0
Result and completion w 14
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 7

✓ No critical or high findings

Medium and low: 7
  • low Risky intent intent-offensive-security references/cspm-checks.md:19
    Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use)
    | Credential harvesting | `iam:CreateAccessKey` + `iam:ListUsers` | High | T1098.001 | Separate roles; restrict CreateAccessKey to self only |
  • low Risky intent intent-offensive-security references/cspm-checks.md:35
    Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use)
    | Versioning disabled | VersioningConfiguration = Suspended or absent | Medium | T1485 | Enable versioning to protect against ransomware deletion |
  • low Risky intent intent-offensive-security SKILL.md:3
    Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use) (quoted — discussed, not commanded)
    description: "Use when assessing cloud infrastructure for security misconfigurations, IAM privilege escalation paths, S3 public exposure, open security group rules, or IaC security gaps. Covers AWS, A
    quoted
  • low Risky intent intent-offensive-security SKILL.md:8
    Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use) (detector / deny-list definition)
    Cloud security posture assessment skill for detecting IAM privilege escalation, public storage exposure, network configuration risks, and infrastructure-as-code misconfigurations. This is NOT incident
    detector
  • low Risky intent intent-offensive-security SKILL.md:31
    Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use)
    This skill provides the methodology and tooling for **cloud security posture management (CSPM)** — systematically checking cloud configurations for misconfigurations that create exploitable attack sur
  • low Risky intent intent-offensive-security SKILL.md:50
    Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use)
    The `cloud_posture_check.py` tool runs three types of checks: `iam` (privilege escalation), `s3` (public access), and `sg` (network exposure). It auto-detects the check type from the config file struc
  • low Risky intent intent-offensive-security SKILL.md:53
    Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use)
    # Analyze an IAM policy for privilege escalation paths

Files scanned: 3. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: ../incident-response/SKILL.md
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: ../threat-detection/SKILL.md
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: ../red-team/SKILL.md
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: ../security-pen-testing/SKILL.md

Process rating: all ten parameters 39/100

Will not run. References files that are not bundled: ../incident-response/SKILL.md, ../threat-detection/SKILL.md, ../red-team/SKILL.md
  • 0Tools and files. 4 referenced file(s) missing: ../incident-response/SKILL.md, ../threat-detection/SKILL.md, ../red-team/SKILL.md
  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 30Running it twice. 15 mutating operations with no state check
  • 70Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
  • 70Execution cost. Instruction body is 4069 tokens
  • 100Steps. 35 steps
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing
  • low 11 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 245: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 29 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 35 items
  • +4Has examples (5 code blocks)
  • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (1 of 1)
  • +3All 1 scripts are documented

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 79.