SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

AC ms365-tenant-manager

Microsoft 365 tenant administration for Global Administrators. Automate M365 tenant setup, Office 365 admin tasks, Azure AD user management, Exchange Online configuration, Teams administration, and security policies. Generate PowerShell scripts for bulk operations, Conditional Access policies, license management, and compliance reporting. Use for M365 tenant manager, Office 365 admin, Azure AD users, Global Administrator, tenant configuration, or Microsoft 365 automation.

alirezarezvani/claude-skills Agent Skills author: alirezarezvani MIT 9 files body ≈ 2 638 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com↗ analyzed 27 h ago

Microsoft 365 tenant administration for Global Administrators.

As a process C 51/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, failures and branches

ProcedureAzureData and analyticsSecurityInfrastructuretype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) OpenClaw Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
A
96/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
99
Quality 40%
91
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
51/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 1

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Medium and low: 1
    • low Secrets in code secret-high-entropy-token scripts/user_management.py:63
      High-entropy token-like string (may be an id, hash or a credential) (quoted — discussed, not commanded)
      license_sku = user.get('license_sku', 'Micr…ard')
      quoted

    Files scanned: 9. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    • note edit-residue the text marks something as outdated (lines 95, 97, 240): check that old rules are not kept next to new ones — the full check reads the text for contradictions

    Process rating: all ten parameters 51/100

    • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
    • 30Running it twice. 3 mutating operations with no state check
    • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (bash, python) that frontmatter does not declare
    • 70Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
    • 100Steps. 34 steps
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 2638 tokens
    • medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +3Description length 476: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 18 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 34 items
    • +4Has examples (14 code blocks)
    • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (3 of 3)
    • +3All 3 scripts are documented

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 91.