SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

AD tech-debt-tracker

Scan codebases for technical debt, score severity, track trends, and generate prioritized remediation plans. Use when users mention tech debt, code quality, refactoring priority, debt scoring, cleanup sprints, or code health assessment. Also use for legacy code modernization planning and maintenance cost estimation.

alirezarezvani/claude-skills Agent Skills author: alirezarezvani MIT 18 files body ≈ 1 092 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com↗ analyzed 2 d ago

Scan codebases for technical debt, score severity, track trends, and generate prioritized remediation plans.

As a process D 47/100 · Unfinished process — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

GeneratorSoftware developmenttype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) OpenClaw Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
A
95/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
98
Quality 40%
91
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
D
47/100
Unfinished process
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 2

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Medium and low: 2
    • low Secrets in code secret-password-literal assets/sample_codebase/src/frontend.js:5
      Hard-coded password / key literal (may be an example)
      const API_KEY = "abc1…456"; // FIXME: Should be in environment
    • low Secrets in code secret-password-literal assets/sample_codebase/src/user_service.py:14
      Hard-coded password / key literal (may be an example) (placeholder value)
      API_KEY = "sk-1…def"  # FIXME: This should be in environment variables
      placeholder

    Files scanned: 18. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 47/100

    • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
    • 30Running it twice. 1 mutating operations with no state check
    • 75Steps. 3 steps
    • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1092 tokens

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +3Description length 317: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 15 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 3 items
    • +4Has examples (3 code blocks)
    • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (4 of 4)
    • +3All 3 scripts are documented

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 91.