SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

BC saas-scaffolder

Generates complete, production-ready SaaS project boilerplate including authentication, database schemas, billing integration, API routes, and a working dashboard using Next.js 14+ App Router, TypeScript, Tailwind CSS, shadcn/ui, Drizzle ORM, and Stripe. Use when the user wants to create a new SaaS app, start a subscription-based web project, scaffold a Next.js application, or mentions terms like starter template, boilerplate, new project, or wiring up auth and payments.

alirezarezvani/claude-skills Agent Skills author: alirezarezvani MIT 6 files body ≈ 2 446 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com↗ analyzed 2 d ago

Generates complete, production-ready SaaS project boilerplate including authentication, database schemas, billing integration, API routes, and a working…

As a process C 60/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, failures and branches, progress reporting

GeneratorStripeSupabaseSoftware developmentData and analyticsCommercetype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) OpenClaw Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
B
89/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
99
Quality 40%
75
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
60/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 1

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Medium and low: 1
    • low Exfiltration read-dotenv scripts/project_bootstrapper.py:152
      Reads a .env file (quoted — discussed, not commanded)
      cp .env.example .env
      quoted

    Files scanned: 6. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 60/100

    • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (bash, node) that frontmatter does not declare
    • 70When it triggers. States when to use, but not when not to
    • 70Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
    • 100Steps. 28 steps
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 2446 tokens
    • 100Running it twice. Mutating operations check current state

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • -2localhost URLs: will not work for another user
    • -44 reference files, but SKILL.md never points to them: the model will not open them
    • -31 of 1 scripts are never mentioned in SKILL.md
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +3Description length 475: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 16 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 28 items
    • +4Has examples (7 code blocks)

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 75.