SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

BC information-security-manager-iso27001

Use when designing or running an ISO 27001 ISMS in HealthTech or MedTech: risk assessment, control implementation, certification or security incidents. Assesses risk with risk_assessment.py and checks controls with compliance_checker.py.

alirezarezvani/claude-skills Agent Skills author: alirezarezvani MIT 6 files · 2 scripts body ≈ 2 810 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com↗ analyzed 8 d ago

Assesses risk with riskassessment.py and checks controls with compliancechecker.py.

As a process C 57/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: when it triggers, inputs and preconditions, failures and branches

ProcedureSecuritytype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) OpenClaw Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
B
93/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
93
Quality 40%
94
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
57/100
Has gaps
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 7

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Medium and low: 7
    • low Risky intent intent-offensive-security references/incident-response.md:25
      Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use) (detector / deny-list definition)
      | Malware | Malicious software infection | Ransomware, virus, trojan |
      detector
    • low Risky intent intent-offensive-security references/incident-response.md:35
      Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use)
      | **Critical (P1)** | Active breach, data loss, system down | Immediate (15 min) | Ransomware, confirmed breach |
    • low Risky intent intent-offensive-security references/incident-response.md:327
      Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use)
      ### Ransomware Recovery
    • low Risky intent intent-offensive-security references/incident-response.md:330
      Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use)
      - [ ] Identify ransomware variant
    • low Risky intent intent-offensive-security references/iso27001-controls.md:252
      Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use)
      - Penetration test reports
    • low Risky intent intent-offensive-security references/risk-assessment-guide.md:79
      Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use)
      | Ransomware | High | All systems | Financial |
    • low Risky intent intent-offensive-security references/risk-assessment-guide.md:131
      Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use)
      2. **Penetration Testing:** Annual third-party tests

    Files scanned: 6. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 57/100

    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
    • 30Running it twice. 3 mutating operations with no state check
    • 60Result and completion. Output format stated, no completion criterion
    • 85Steps. 81 steps, 1 vague phrases
    • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 2810 tokens
    • medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +3Description length 237: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 25 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 81 items
    • +3Output format is stated explicitly
    • +4Has examples (12 code blocks)
    • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (3 of 3)
    • +3All 2 scripts are documented

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 94.