AF soc2-compliance
Use when the user asks to prepare for SOC 2 audits, map Trust Service Criteria, build control matrices, collect audit evidence, perform gap analysis, or assess SOC 2 Type I vs Type II readiness.
Use when the user asks to prepare for SOC 2 audits, map Trust Service Criteria, build control matrices, collect audit evidence, perform gap analysis, or…
As a process F 39/100 · Will not run — References files that are not bundled: ../gdpr-dsgvo-expert/SKILL.md, ../information-security-manager-iso27001/SKILL.md, ../isms-audit-expert/SKILL.md
How to improve
- The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 3
✓ No critical or high findings
Medium and low: 3
-
low Risky intent
intent-offensive-securityreferences/evidence_collection_guide.md:75Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use)| Penetration testing | Pentest policy, scope definition | Pentest reports (annual), remediation records |
-
low Risky intent
intent-offensive-securityreferences/evidence_collection_guide.md:169Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use)│ │ └── pent…pdf
-
low Risky intent
intent-offensive-securitySKILL.md:301Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use)| Critical | Processes/stores customer data | Annual + continuous monitoring | SOC 2 Type II, penetration test, security review |
Files scanned: 8. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: ../gdpr-dsgvo-expert/SKILL.md - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: ../information-security-manager-iso27001/SKILL.md - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: ../isms-audit-expert/SKILL.md
Process rating: all ten parameters 39/100
- 0Tools and files. 3 referenced file(s) missing: ../gdpr-dsgvo-expert/SKILL.md, ../information-security-manager-iso27001/SKILL.md, ../isms-audit-expert/SKILL.md
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
- 30Running it twice. 3 mutating operations with no state check
- 70When it triggers. States when to use, but not when not to
- 70Execution cost. Instruction body is 4640 tokens
- 100Steps. 63 steps
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Progress reporting. Reports progress
- medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing
- low 13 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 194: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 45 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 63 items
- +4Has examples (5 code blocks)
- +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (3 of 4)
- +3All 3 scripts are documented
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 79.