SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

CF obsidian-markdown

技术写作员与内容创作者在构建Obsidian知识库时，当需要编写带双向链接、Callout或Frontmatter的复杂笔记，使用此技能可精准生成标准Markdown文档，完美支持wikilinks与嵌入，大幅提升知识管理与排版效率！

anbeime/skill Agent Skills author: anbeime 1 file body ≈ 2 627 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com↗ analyzed 27 h ago

技术写作员与内容创作者在构建Obsidian知识库时，当需要编写带双向链接、Callout或Frontmatter的复杂笔记，使用此技能可精准生成标准Markdown文档，完美支持wikilinks与嵌入，大幅提升知识管理与排版效率！

As a process F 32/100 · Will not run — References files that are not bundled: Note%20Name.md, Note%20Name.md

ProcedureObsidianLaTeXGitHubSoftware developmenttype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) OpenClaw Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
C
82/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
55
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
F
32/100
Will not run
References files that are not bundled: Note%20Name.md, Note%20Name.md
Tools and files w 18
0
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
  2. The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 1. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: Note%20Name.md
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: Note%20Name.md

Process rating: all ten parameters 32/100

Will not run. References files that are not bundled: Note%20Name.md, Note%20Name.md
  • 0Tools and files. 2 referenced file(s) missing: Note%20Name.md, Note%20Name.md
  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 30Running it twice. 2 mutating operations with no state check
  • 85Steps. 19 steps, 1 vague phrases
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 2627 tokens
  • 100Progress reporting. Reports progress
  • low 20 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Description length 117: 120–800 characters recommended
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • -5TODO / placeholder text left in the skill
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +4Structure: 57 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 19 items
  • +4Has examples (56 code blocks)

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 55.