SKILLEMALL.ai

BC apify-ashby-jobs-scraper

Scrape Ashby jobs or discover companies using Ashby with the Apify Ashby Job Board API Actor (johnvc/ashby-job-board-scraper). Job mode returns live job rows with title, company, location, remote and employment fields, publish date, apply URL, employer-published salary columns, equity flag, and Markdown descriptions. Company mode finds Ashby boards from a bundled directory or checks a prospect list, returning company name, board slug and URL, live open-job count, and verification fields. Takes company names, board slugs, or board URLs; supports pre-billing job filters and publishedAfter feeds. Use for Ashby jobs data or API requests, salary and remote-role collection, job-board pipelines, companies using Ashby/Ashby customers, ATS market maps, prospect checks, and recruiting or sales target lists. Billed per delivered result with no start fee, and MCP-ready for Claude and other AI agents.

apify/awesome-skills Agent Skills author: apify 3 files body ≈ 3 365 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com↗ analyzed 3 d ago

Scrape Ashby jobs or discover companies using Ashby with the Apify Ashby Job Board API Actor (johnvc/ashby-job-board-scraper).

As a process C 56/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, running it twice

ProcedureAI and agentsSales and CRMtype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
B
94/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
85
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
56/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
When it triggers w 12
20
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 3. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "author_url"

    Process rating: all ten parameters 56/100

    • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
    • 30Running it twice. 14 mutating operations with no state check
    • 50Failures and branches. 0 branches, has a failure section
    • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (web) that frontmatter does not declare
    • 70Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
    • 100Steps. 72 steps
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 3365 tokens
    • low 13 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill
    • low The skill ranks results itself: that belongs to the system behind the tool, not the model

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +3Description length 901: 120–800 characters recommended
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +4Structure: 16 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 72 items
    • +4Has examples (7 code blocks)
    • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (2 of 2)
    • +1License stated

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 85.