SKILLEMALL.ai

BB apify-google-maps-leads

Build a local-business lead database from Google Maps in one Apify pipeline: search by target audience + geography, enrich each place with company contacts from its website, leads enrichment (names, emails, phones, LinkedIn), Instagram + Facebook profiles, and optionally reviews for lead scoring. For places with no named contacts, escalate to apify/ai-web-scraper to pull owner / decision-maker names from the business website. Backfill missing phones via scalelist/phone-finder and missing emails via scalelist/email-finder. Use when the user asks to build a lead list from Google Maps, scrape local businesses, generate B2B leads by city/industry, find owner/decision-maker contacts for restaurants / dentists / gyms / hotels / any local vertical, score leads by review volume or rating, or says "Google Maps lead-gen pipeline", "leads from Maps", "prospect local businesses", "scrape Google Maps for outreach", "find companies in <city>", or mentions chaining Google Maps + AI web scraper + Scalelist Actors.

apify/awesome-skills Agent Skills author: apify 6 files body ≈ 3 453 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com↗ analyzed 3 d ago

Build a local-business lead database from Google Maps in one Apify pipeline: search by target audience + geography, enrich each place with company contacts…

As a process B 70/100 · Nearly there — weak spots: result and completion, progress reporting

GeneratorSales and CRMMarketingInfrastructuretype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
B
92/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
79
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
B
70/100
Nearly there
Result and completion w 14
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
Tools and files w 18
60
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 6. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    • warning frontmatter-yaml SKILL.md: the frontmatter is not valid YAML (YAML parse error: Nested mappings are not allowed in compact mappings at line 2, column 14: description: Build a local-business lead database from Google Maps in one Apify… ^ ); fields were read line by line. The usual cause is a colon inside an unquoted value
    • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "author_url"

    Process rating: all ten parameters 70/100

    • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (bash) that frontmatter does not declare
    • 70When it triggers. States when to use, but not when not to
    • 70Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
    • 100Steps. 50 steps
    • 100Failures and branches. 7 branches, has a failure section
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 3453 tokens
    • 100Running it twice. Mutating operations check current state
    • medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +3Description length 1013: 120–800 characters recommended
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +5Description quotes 5 example trigger phrases
    • +4Structure: 13 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 50 items
    • +4Has examples (9 code blocks)
    • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (4 of 4)

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 79.