SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

CF commit-gate

The only path to a commit. Routed to when the user invokes /commit or otherwise instructs codeArbiter to persist staged changes. Nine gated phases — permission, branch, classification, verification (test/lint/secrets), behavioral proof, diff review, selective stage, message, commit. Nothing reaches version control without clearing every gate; "it looks good" is not authorization.

arbiterForge/codeArbiter Agent Skills author: arbiterForge AGPL-3.0 1 file body ≈ 4 226 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com↗ analyzed 25 h ago

The only path to a commit.

As a process F 67/100 · Will not run — References files that are not bundled: ../../includes/verification-boundary.md, ../../includes/artifacts.md, ../crypto-compliance/SKILL.md

AnalyzerSoftware developmenttype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) OpenClaw Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
C
85/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
63
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
F
67/100
Will not run
References files that are not bundled: ../../includes/verification-boundary.md, ../../includes/artifacts.md, ../crypto-compliance/SKILL.md
Tools and files w 18
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
Result and completion w 14
40
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten
This is a copy of a skill from another catalog; the rating counts the canonical one: commit-gate (arbiterForge/codeArbiter)

How to improve

  1. The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 1. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: ../../includes/verification-boundary.md
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: ../../includes/artifacts.md
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: ../crypto-compliance/SKILL.md
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: ../secret-handling/SKILL.md
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: ../../agents/migration-reviewer.md
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: ../../agents/security-reviewer.md
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: ../../includes/fresh-verification.md
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: ../../includes/harvest.md

Process rating: all ten parameters 67/100

Will not run. References files that are not bundled: ../../includes/verification-boundary.md, ../../includes/artifacts.md, ../crypto-compliance/SKILL.md
  • 0Tools and files. 8 referenced file(s) missing: ../../includes/verification-boundary.md, ../../includes/artifacts.md, ../crypto-compliance/SKILL.md
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 40Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 70Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
  • 70Execution cost. Instruction body is 4226 tokens
  • 100Steps. 44 steps
  • 100When it triggers. States when to use and when not to
  • 100Failures and branches. 1 branches, has a failure section
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Running it twice. Mutating operations check current state
  • medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing
  • low 12 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill
  • low The response is described with custom markup (5 tags): a typed call is more reliable

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • +4No input/output examples
  • -5TODO / placeholder text left in the skill
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 382: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 13 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 44 items

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 63.