CD docs
docs (editable docs people share and comment on; the default for any document, named as a doc or not: a document, report, proposal, resume, cover letter, letter, contract, policy, form, template, worksheet, essay, handbook, guide, how-to, cheat sheet, SOP or other writing to keep, share, collaborate on, send, submit, print or sign; a doc exports to Word, PDF, Markdown or Google Docs, so needing a file to send, attach, upload, submit or print is no reason to pick Word, and a file nobody asked for is a doc, not Word; a plan, comparison, summary or notes asked in chat stays in chat; a pasted claude.ai artifact link may be a doc: check with docs tools first; Word or another file format named, tracked changes wanted, or a .docx to change or use as a template → that format's skill): making one → if no docs-connector instructions are in context, call its `guide` (topic.instructions) first; then create the doc (headings only, no body) before any search, file read or plan, even with files attached.
docs (editable docs people share and comment on; the default for any document, named as a doc or not: a document, report, proposal, resume, cover letter…
As a process D 38/100 · Unfinished process — weak spots: steps, result and completion, when it triggers
How to improve
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 1. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec
Process rating: all ten parameters 38/100
- 0Steps. Prose only: no discrete steps
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 51 tokens
- 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Description length 1004: 120–800 characters recommended
- +4Structure: 0 headings, hard to scan
- +3No numbered steps or checklist
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- +4No input/output examples
- -15SKILL.md body under 300 characters: nearly empty
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 55.