AC fleet-manager
Coding-agent sessions on every machine you connected, over Herdr where it runs, tmux elsewhere, and MSP for your MSP hosts: one digest of what is waiting on you, ready for review, working or idle; open a session with a brief; read, steer, approve, stop, close; connect a machine in one command. Use for "my sessions", "my agents", "what needs me", another session or machine, "connect <host>", and Herdr asks (workspace, panes, tabs, lanes) when running inside Herdr; not the current pane itself (`herdr`), not peer-session messaging (`list_peer_sessions`).
Coding-agent sessions on every machine you connected, over Herdr where it runs, tmux elsewhere, and MSP for your MSP hosts: one digest of what is waiting on…
As a process C 50/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions
How to improve
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 13. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "experimental-gate"
Process rating: all ten parameters 50/100
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 30Running it twice. 13 mutating operations with no state check
- 50Failures and branches. 0 branches, has a failure section
- 60Tools and files. Uses tools (bash, web) that frontmatter does not declare
- 100Steps. 6 steps
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 2266 tokens
- 100Progress reporting. Reports progress
- medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing
- low The response is described with custom markup (27 tags): a typed call is more reliable
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- -37 of 8 scripts are never mentioned in SKILL.md
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +5Description quotes 4 example trigger phrases
- +3Description length 557: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 8 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 6 items
- +4Has examples (1 code blocks)
- +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (4 of 4)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 89.