CD goose-graphics
Portable visual skill pack for the Agent Skills ecosystem (Claude Code, Claude Desktop, Claude Cowork, Claude Design, Goose, Cursor, Codex). Discovers community-published styles + formats via the gooseworks CLI, runs an extract-style workflow on reference images, and exports rendered PNGs via Playwright.
Portable visual skill pack for the Agent Skills ecosystem (Claude Code, Claude Desktop, Claude Cowork, Claude Design, Goose, Cursor, Codex).
As a process D 49/100 · Unfinished process — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions
How to improve
- Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
- The SKILL.md body is over 5,000 tokens: move reference detail into references/ and load it when needed.
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 1
✓ No critical or high findings
Medium and low: 1
-
low Secrets in code
secret-high-entropy-tokenscreenshot/package-lock.json:17High-entropy token-like string (may be an id, hash or a credential) (detector / deny-list definition)"integrity": "sha5…uWm+fFRcIOgKBMiOBP+eXiy…9ab+DDKA==",
detector
Files scanned: 11. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
description-no-whendescription does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when") - warning
body-longSKILL.md body ≈ 5083 tokens (recommended < 5000); move details to references/
Process rating: all ten parameters 49/100
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 60Tools and files. Uses tools (bash, web) that frontmatter does not declare
- 65Failures and branches. 3 branches
- 70Execution cost. Instruction body is 5083 tokens
- 85Steps. 62 steps, 1 vague phrases
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Running it twice. Mutating operations check current state
- medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing
- low 18 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill
- high The skill tells the model to perform an irreversible action with no human approval
- low The response is described with custom markup (6 tags): a typed call is more reliable
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 305: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 29 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 62 items
- +4Has examples (13 code blocks)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 62.