BF render-chatgpt-chat
Assemble a ChatGPT chat-reveal video ad from a thread + timeline JSON — one continuous Playwright recording of a ChatGPT mobile chat (user types with the iOS keyboard up → taps send → keyboard slides down + header cluster swaps in one beat → one gray loading dot → the assistant answer streams in word-by-word) crossfaded into a designed end card, with subliminal ChatGPT SFX and an optional ducked music bed. FREE assembly (Playwright + ffmpeg); the recipe supplies the per-brand thread + timeline + end-card config and gates the paid music call to its own capability. The ChatGPT sibling of render-imessage-chat. Use for the chatgpt-chat format.
Assemble a ChatGPT chat-reveal video ad from a thread + timeline JSON — one continuous Playwright recording of a ChatGPT mobile chat (user types with the iOS…
As a process F 33/100 · No process to follow — References files that are not bundled: assets/sfx/*.wav
How to improve
- The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 10. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: assets/sfx/*.wav - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "status" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "superseded_by"
Process rating: all ten parameters 33/100
- 0Tools and files. 1 referenced file(s) missing: assets/sfx/*.wav
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 30Running it twice. 19 mutating operations with no state check
- 100Steps. 25 steps
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 2161 tokens
- medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 647: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 9 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 25 items
- +4Has examples (1 code blocks)
- +3All 3 scripts are documented
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 79.