AC rust-review
Audits Rust code for unsafe blocks, ownership issues, and Cargo dependency risks. Use when reviewing Rust code or before merging Rust changes.
Audits Rust code for unsafe blocks, ownership issues, and Cargo dependency risks.
As a process C 59/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: when it triggers, inputs and preconditions, failures and branches
Runs in: Hermes Agent
How to improve
- For Hermes the description must be one sentence under 60 characters; move the conditions to a "When to Use" section.
For the model run — optional
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 28. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
description-long-hermesdescription is 142 chars; the Hermes authoring standard requires ≤ 60 (one sentence, ending with a period) - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "globs" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "alwaysApply" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "tools" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "usage_patterns" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "complexity" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "model_hint" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "estimated_tokens" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "progressive_loading" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "dependencies" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "modules"
Process rating: all ten parameters 59/100
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 30Running it twice. 8 mutating operations with no state check
- 60Result and completion. Output format stated, no completion criterion
- 85Steps. 83 steps, 1 vague phrases
- 100Tools and files. Tools declared in frontmatter
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1889 tokens
- 100Progress reporting. Reports progress
- medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing
- low 10 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 142: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 15 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 83 items
- +3Output format is stated explicitly
- +4Has examples (2 code blocks)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 78.