SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

BD researcher

Conducts investigative-grade research with primary source analysis, cross-verification, and trial-level depth. Use when an album needs factual research, source material, or verification of claims.

bitwize-music-studio/claude-ai-music-skills Claude Code author: bitwize-music-studio 4 files body ≈ 2 628 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com↗ analyzed 9 h ago

Conducts investigative-grade research with primary source analysis, cross-verification, and trial-level depth.

As a process D 44/100 · Unfinished process — References files that are not bundled: URL

AnalyzerResearchWriting and documentsAI and agentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) OpenClaw Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
B
91/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
99
Quality 40%
79
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
D
44/100
Unfinished process
References files that are not bundled: URL
Tools and files w 18
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 1

✓ No critical or high findings

Medium and low: 1
  • low Risky intent intent-offensive-security SKILL.md:252
    Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use)
    | `researchers-security` | Malware analysis, CVEs |

Files scanned: 4. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: URL
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "effort"
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "prerequisites"

Process rating: all ten parameters 44/100

Will not run. References files that are not bundled: URL
  • 0Tools and files. 1 referenced file(s) missing: URL
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 30Running it twice. 2 mutating operations with no state check
  • 55Failures and branches. 1 branches
  • 60Result and completion. Output format stated, no completion criterion
  • 85Steps. 85 steps, 1 vague phrases
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 2628 tokens

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 196: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 26 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 85 items
  • +3Output format is stated explicitly
  • +4Has examples (4 code blocks)

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 79.