SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

CC context-engineering

设计 Agent 系统提示词、上下文结构或按需加载的 Skill 时使用——覆盖 API 消息角色与「静态前缀 + 轨迹」结构、系统提示词写法（结构化、SOP、业务规则细化、few-shot）、Agent Skills 渐进式披露与 SKILL.md 编写、提示注入的上下文层防御，以及注意力位置偏好等布局原则。

bojieli/ai-agent-book Agent Skills author: bojieli Apache-2.0 1 file body ≈ 1 171 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com↗ analyzed 6 d ago

设计 Agent 系统提示词、上下文结构或按需加载的 Skill 时使用——覆盖 API 消息角色与「静态前缀 + 轨迹」结构、系统提示词写法（结构化、SOP、业务规则细化、few-shot）、Agent Skills 渐进式披露与 SKILL.md 编写、提示注入的上下文层防御，以及注意力位置偏好等布局原则。

As a process C 54/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, inputs and preconditions, failures and branches

IntegrationAI and agentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) OpenClaw Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
C
89/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
72
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
54/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 1. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")

Process rating: all ten parameters 54/100

  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 30Running it twice. 1 mutating operations with no state check
  • 50When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
  • 100Steps. 44 steps
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1171 tokens
  • low The response is described with custom markup (4 tags): a typed call is more reliable

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 156: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 12 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 44 items
  • +4Has examples (1 code blocks)

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 72.