SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

BD dependency-auditor

Scan project dependencies for vulnerabilities, license issues, and upgrade opportunities across Python, Node.js, Go, and Rust. Use when auditing dependencies, checking licenses, planning upgrades, or assessing supply chain security.

borghei/Claude-Skills Agent Skills author: borghei 17 files · 3 scripts body ≈ 2 127 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com↗ analyzed 32 h ago

Scan project dependencies for vulnerabilities, license issues, and upgrade opportunities across Python, Node.js, Go, and Rust. Use when auditing dependencies…

As a process D 45/100 · Unfinished process — References files that are not bundled: assets/sample_go.mod

AnalyzerSecuritySoftware developmenttype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) OpenClaw Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
B
93/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
98
Quality 40%
86
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
D
45/100
Unfinished process
References files that are not bundled: assets/sample_go.mod
Tools and files w 18
0
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 2

✓ No critical or high findings

Medium and low: 2
  • low Risky intent intent-offensive-security references/vulnerability_assessment_guide.md:15
    Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use)
    - **Examples**: Remote code execution, privilege escalation to admin
  • low Risky intent intent-offensive-security references/vulnerability_assessment_guide.md:67
    Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use)
    #### Privilege Escalation

Files scanned: 17. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: assets/sample_go.mod

Process rating: all ten parameters 45/100

Will not run. References files that are not bundled: assets/sample_go.mod
  • 0Tools and files. 1 referenced file(s) missing: assets/sample_go.mod
  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 100Steps. 24 steps
  • 100Failures and branches. 2 branches, has a failure section
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 2127 tokens
  • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 232: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 10 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 24 items
  • +4Has examples (1 code blocks)
  • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (5 of 5)
  • +3All 3 scripts are documented
  • +1License stated

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 86.