BC pre-mortem
Runs a pre-mortem that sorts launch risks into evidenced tigers, paper tigers and unspoken elephants, each with an owner. Use when a big launch, build or migration is coming, or the team has a bad feeling it cannot name.
Runs a pre-mortem that sorts launch risks into evidenced tigers, paper tigers and unspoken elephants, each with an owner.
As a process C 55/100 · Has gaps — References files that are not bundled: references/*.md
How to improve
- The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 4
✓ No critical or high findings
Medium and low: 4
-
low Risky intent
intent-offensive-securityexamples/shared-dashboards-v1-pre-mortem.md:159Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use) (test fixture / example file)- Penetration test on the embed flow scheduled
fixture -
low Risky intent
intent-offensive-securityexamples/shared-dashboards-v1-pre-mortem.md:162Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use) (test fixture / example file)- Bug bounty pre-announcement to the security
fixture -
low Risky intent
intent-offensive-securityexamples/shared-dashboards-v1-pre-mortem.md:378Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use) (test fixture / example file)- Penetration test (R3) is COMPLETE and clean
fixture -
low Risky intent
intent-offensive-securityexamples/shared-dashboards-v1-pre-mortem.md:408Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use) (test fixture / example file)- **Launch readiness gate is explicit.** All 14 Tigers in progress + all 3 Elephants resolved + penetration test + DPIA + indexing controls. Without these, the launch slips. The slip authority is name
fixture
Files scanned: 9. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: references/*.md
Process rating: all ten parameters 55/100
- 0Tools and files. 1 referenced file(s) missing: references/*.md
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 30Running it twice. 2 mutating operations with no state check
- 40Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 50When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 55Failures and branches. 1 branches
- 70Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
- 100Steps. 19 steps
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1885 tokens
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 220: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 13 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 19 items
- +4Has examples (1 code blocks)
- +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (3 of 3)
- +3All 1 scripts are documented
- +1License stated
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 86.