SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

AB summarize-meeting

Turns meeting notes or transcripts into a summary of decisions, owned and dated action items, and open questions. Use when writing up a meeting, a recap email or a decision log; for patterns across a series use meeting-analyzer.

borghei/Claude-Skills Agent Skills author: borghei 10 files · 3 scripts body ≈ 2 140 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com↗ analyzed 8 h ago

Turns meeting notes or transcripts into a summary of decisions, owned and dated action items, and open questions.

As a process B 67/100 · Nearly there — weak spots: result and completion, inputs and preconditions, running it twice

AnalyzerJiraConfluenceWriting and documentsOperations and projectstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) OpenClaw Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
A
96/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
99
Quality 40%
92
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
B
67/100
Nearly there
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Running it twice w 4
30
Result and completion w 14
40
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 1

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Medium and low: 1
    • low Concealment en-hide-from-user references/meeting-facilitation-guide.md:153
      Instruction to hide actions from the user (negated — the text forbids it)
      **Fix:** Appoint a timekeeper. When time is up, decide to either extend (with consent) or schedule a follow-up. Do not silently run over.
      negated

    Files scanned: 10. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 67/100

    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 30Running it twice. 10 mutating operations with no state check
    • 40Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 50When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
    • 55Failures and branches. 1 branches
    • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
    • 100Steps. 11 steps
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 2140 tokens
    • 100Progress reporting. Reports progress

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +3Description length 228: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 13 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 11 items
    • +4Has examples (1 code blocks)
    • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (3 of 3)
    • +3All 3 scripts are documented
    • +1License stated

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 92.