SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

AC amazon-listing-competitor-analysis-skill

This skill helps users analyze Amazon competitor listings by ASIN and produce structured competitive intelligence plus strategic opportunity points for their own go-to-market. The Agent should proactively apply this skill when users want to analyze a competitor Amazon listing by ASIN, understand what a top-ranked product does right in content keywords or visuals, find market gaps and unmet buyer needs, turn competitor research into opportunity maps for their brand, identify keyword placement patterns on rival listings, extract SEO insights from Amazon product pages, reverse-engineer competitor bullet and title strategies, mine competitor reviews for buyer psychology, compare seller and A plus content patterns, run gap analysis before launching a new SKU, research why a listing wins conversion signals, synthesize whitespace you can own versus the diagnosed listing, or say just look at this ASIN with a competitive or optimization angle.

browser-act/skills Agent Skills author: browser-act MIT 2 files · 1 script body ≈ 2 949 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com↗ analyzed 5 d ago

This skill helps users analyze Amazon competitor listings by ASIN and produce structured competitive intelligence plus strategic opportunity points for their…

As a process C 62/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: when it triggers, inputs and preconditions, progress reporting

AnalyzerMarketingAI and agentsCommercetype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) OpenClaw Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
A
95/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
87
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
62/100
Has gaps
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
When it triggers w 12
20
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 2. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 62/100

    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
    • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (bash) that frontmatter does not declare
    • 60Result and completion. Output format stated, no completion criterion
    • 85Steps. 57 steps, 1 vague phrases
    • 100Failures and branches. 2 branches, has a failure section
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 2949 tokens
    • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +3Description length 948: 120–800 characters recommended
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +4Structure: 14 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 57 items
    • +3Output format is stated explicitly
    • +4Has examples (2 code blocks)
    • +3All 1 scripts are documented

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 87.