SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

BC etsy-product-detail

Etsy product detail scraper: given an Etsy listing URL, returns full product detail including listingId, title, priceCurrent, priceOriginal, currency, images (all), description, shopName, shopUrl, rating, reviewCount, favorites, inCartCount, variations (with per-option price ranges), highlights, listedDate, relatedTags. Use when user mentions Etsy product, Etsy listing detail, Etsy item info, Etsy product page, scrape Etsy listing, extract Etsy product data, Etsy price and variations, Etsy product images, Etsy product description, Etsy shop from listing, Etsy favorites count, Etsy sale count, Etsy variations extraction, Etsy listing metadata, single Etsy product scrape, bulk enrich Etsy listing URLs, Etsy product details export. Also applies to competitor product monitoring, price and variation tracking on a specific listing, favorites/wishlist popularity tracking, description mining for SEO analysis, and any per-listing enrichment task.

browser-act/skills Agent Skills author: browser-act MIT 2 files · 1 script body ≈ 2 030 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com↗ analyzed 6 d ago

Etsy product detail scraper: given an Etsy listing URL, returns full product detail including listingId, title, priceCurrent, priceOriginal, currency, images…

As a process C 64/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, running it twice

AnalyzerInfrastructureMarketingSoftware developmenttype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) OpenClaw Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
B
94/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
84
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
64/100
Has gaps
Progress reporting w 2
0
When it triggers w 12
20
Running it twice w 4
30
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 2. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 64/100

    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
    • 30Running it twice. 2 mutating operations with no state check
    • 40Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (bash, web, python) that frontmatter does not declare
    • 70Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
    • 85Steps. 22 steps, 1 vague phrases
    • 100Failures and branches. 1 branches, has a failure section
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 2030 tokens

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +3Description length 951: 120–800 characters recommended
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +4Structure: 13 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 22 items
    • +4Has examples (1 code blocks)
    • +3All 1 scripts are documented

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 84.