SKILLEMALL.ai

CC walmart-category-listing

Walmart category page scraper: input a walmart.com browse or category URL with optional page number, extract paginated product listings with itemId, url, title, brand, image, price, wasPrice, rating, reviewCount, availability, seller info, fulfillmentBadge, and classType. Use when user mentions walmart category, walmart browse page, walmart category listing, scrape walmart category, walmart department scrape, walmart category URL, browse walmart categories, walmart category products, walmart category page scraper, walmart browse scraper, extract walmart category items, walmart filtered category, walmart subcategory products, walmart browse items, walmart department listing, walmart catalog browse, walmart aisle scraper. Also applies to collecting products from a specific walmart category URL with filters applied (e.g. filtered category URLs copied from the browser), scraping all items from a walmart browse section, category-scoped price monitoring on walmart, and parent category crawling where subcategory URLs are enumerated first.

browser-act/skills Agent Skills author: browser-act MIT 2 files · 1 script body ≈ 1 506 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com↗ analyzed 6 d ago

Walmart category page scraper: input a walmart.com browse or category URL with optional page number, extract paginated product listings with itemId, url…

As a process C 54/100 · Has gaps — References files that are not bundled: scripts/*.py

AnalyzerMarketingInfrastructuretype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
C
81/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
53
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
54/100
Has gaps
References files that are not bundled: scripts/*.py
Tools and files w 18
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
When it triggers w 12
20
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Shorten the description to 1024 characters.
  2. The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 2. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • error description-long description is 1047 chars, limit 1024
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: scripts/*.py

Process rating: all ten parameters 54/100

Will not run. References files that are not bundled: scripts/*.py
  • 0Tools and files. 1 referenced file(s) missing: scripts/*.py
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 30Running it twice. 3 mutating operations with no state check
  • 40Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 70Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
  • 85Steps. 16 steps, 2 vague phrases
  • 100Failures and branches. 1 branches, has a failure section
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1506 tokens
  • low 10 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Description length 1047: 120–800 characters recommended
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +4Structure: 13 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 16 items
  • +4Has examples (2 code blocks)
  • +3All 1 scripts are documented

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 53.