SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

BC youtube-influencer-finder-api-skill

This skill helps users extract YouTube influencer profiles including social links, subscriber counts, and channel stats via the BrowserAct API. Agent should proactively apply this skill when users express needs like finding YouTube creators for specific keywords, discovering influencers for a marketing campaign, extracting YouTube channel contact emails, scraping YouTube influencer social media links, gathering subscriber counts for YouTube creators, researching top YouTube channels in a specific niche, compiling a list of YouTube content creators with recent uploads, collecting YouTube creator profiles for outreach, extracting total views and video counts for specific YouTube influencers, building a database of YouTube partners for market research, finding YouTube influencers who uploaded videos this month, or monitoring competitor influencer activities on YouTube.

browser-act/skills Agent Skills author: browser-act MIT 2 files · 1 script body ≈ 1 103 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com↗ analyzed 5 d ago

This skill helps users extract YouTube influencer profiles including social links, subscriber counts, and channel stats via the BrowserAct API.

As a process C 56/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

IntegrationYouTubeMedia and videotype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) OpenClaw Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
B
94/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
84
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
56/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 2. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 56/100

    • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
    • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (bash) that frontmatter does not declare
    • 100Steps. 33 steps
    • 100Failures and branches. 2 branches, has a failure section
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1103 tokens
    • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +3Description length 878: 120–800 characters recommended
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +4Structure: 9 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 33 items
    • +4Has examples (1 code blocks)
    • +3All 1 scripts are documented

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 84.