BC publicity-distribution
Write and distribute launch and publicity content across LinkedIn, X/Twitter, Instagram, Discord, Medium, Substack, and YouTube. Produces per-platform copy that does not read as AI-written (no em dashes, no "thrilled to announce", no engagement-bait), plus the exact image/video specs and character limits each platform wants. Use this skill whenever the user wants to announce, launch, publicize, promote, cross-post, or share anything - a product, a feature, an open-source release, a research paper, a blog post, a demo video, a milestone, a job opening, or a conference talk. Trigger it on phrases like "post this on LinkedIn", "write a launch tweet", "announce this", "share this in Discord", "turn this into a thread", "what should I post", "write a Medium article about", "help me with distribution", "draft a YouTube description", "make this sound less like AI", or "de-slop this post". Also use it when the user has just finished shipping something and asks how to get it in front of people.
Promises to write platform-specific posts without AI jargon and deliver exact image and video specs for each channel. Files contain templates for seven platforms with character limits and format requirements. Grade B shows 86% content quality but only 62% process efficiency. No critical errors, but gaps in trigger logic and incomplete video format instructions.
In practice, the skill handles basic distribution—splits announcements across platforms and strips typical AI phrases like em-dashes and corporate enthusiasm. Falls short on complex cases where tone needs real audience adaptation or niche platforms enter the mix. Worth installing if you need mechanical content distribution, but don't expect deep channel-specific customization.
Write and distribute launch and publicity content across LinkedIn, X/Twitter, Instagram, Discord, Medium, Substack, and YouTube.
As a process C 62/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, inputs and preconditions, running it twice
How to improve
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 17. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec
Process rating: all ten parameters 62/100
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 30Running it twice. 1 mutating operations with no state check
- 55Failures and branches. 1 branches
- 70When it triggers. States when to use, but not when not to
- 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
- 100Steps. 30 steps
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1637 tokens
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Description length 1000: 120–800 characters recommended
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- +4No input/output examples
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +5Description quotes 12 example trigger phrases
- +4Structure: 11 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 30 items
- +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (3 of 3)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 86.