AC construction-safety-inspector
施工作业安全督察专家技能。当用户上传施工作业现场图片，要求分析安全隐患、提出整改建议时激活。触发词：安全检查、安全隐患分析、施工现场、特殊作业（动火/高处/受限空间/临时用电/吊装/盲板抽堵/动土/断路）、gb30871、施工作业安全、安全督察、安全隐患。 Also activates when user mentions uploading safety management documents for learning.
As a process C 53/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions
How to improve
For the model run — optional
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 5. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "AIGC"
Process rating: all ten parameters 53/100
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
- 100Steps. 57 steps
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 673 tokens
- 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 214: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 9 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 57 items
- +4Has examples (1 code blocks)
- +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (2 of 3)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 87.
External checks
ClawHub: suspicious
The skill is a coherent construction-safety assistant, but it can persist uploaded safety documents into its own reference files without a clear approval or review step.
LLM: suspicious (high) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026