SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

AB software-architecture-design

Produces a complete software architecture design document following a 12-phase SOP. Supports web backend, mobile, ML/AI, data pipeline, embedded/IoT. Generates Mermaid and PlantUML diagrams. Use when asked to do architecture design, system design, technical design, or says: 做架构设计 系统设计 技术方案 架构文档.

ClawHub Agent Skills author: 1231111 v1.1.0 MIT-0 10 files body ≈ 1 858 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai↗ analyzed 30 h ago

Produces a complete software architecture design document following a 12-phase SOP.

As a process B 68/100 · Nearly there — weak spots: inputs and preconditions, failures and branches, running it twice

GeneratorDesignAI and agentsData and analyticstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: OpenClaw Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
A
94/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
84
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
B
68/100
Nearly there
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 10. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 68/100

    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 30Running it twice. 8 mutating operations with no state check
    • 50When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
    • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
    • 100Steps. 56 steps
    • 100Result and completion. Output format and completion criterion are stated
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1858 tokens
    • low 16 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +4No input/output examples
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +3Description length 296: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 17 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 56 items
    • +3Output format is stated explicitly
    • +1License stated

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 84.

    External checks

    ClawHub: clean
    This is a documentation-only architecture-design skill, with one privacy caution around ML logging guidance but no evidence of hidden execution or data access.
    LLM: benign (high) · VirusTotal: · 28 May 2026