BD bigmodel-image-video
使用 BigModel (CogView/CogVideoX) API 生成高质量图片和视频。当用户需要"生成图片"、"制作视频"、"AI 绘画"、"创建封面"、"设计海报"、"视觉内容生成"、或任何需要创建图像/视频内容的场景时使用此技能。即使没有明确提到"生成",只要用户需要创建、设计或制作视觉内容(如小说封面、产品图片、宣传图、短视频等),都应该主动使用此技能。
As a process D 46/100 · Unfinished process — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions
What is at stake
Medium-severity findings: the skill is probably honest, but read what alarmed the scanner.
Below is the worst case for this category. The finding here is medium: the guard saw a sign, not a proof.
The skill contains commands that delete files, rewrite disks or execute code fetched from the network. The agent may run them without asking if it believes the instructions require it.
Replace destructive commands with safe equivalents that ask for confirmation, scope them to one folder, and stop piping curl into a shell: pin a version and a checksum.
How to improve
- Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 3
✓ No critical or high findings
Medium and low: 3
-
medium Dangerous commands
cmd-shell-rcREADME.md:30Writes to a shell startup fileecho 'export BIGMODEL_API_KEY=your_api_key_here' >> ~/.zshrc
-
medium Dangerous commands
cmd-shell-rcSKILL.md:23Writes to a shell startup fileecho 'export BIGMODEL_API_KEY=your_api_key_here' >> ~/.zshrc
-
low Dangerous commands
cmd-shell-rcscripts/generate.py:141Writes to a shell startup file (string literal in code, not executed)print(" echo 'export BIGMODEL_API_KEY=your_api_key_here' >> ~/.zshrc")code literal
Files scanned: 9. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
description-no-whendescription does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")
Process rating: all ten parameters 46/100
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 60Tools and files. Uses tools (python) that frontmatter does not declare
- 100Steps. 24 steps
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1162 tokens
- 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
- medium 5 test cases, all positive: not one "should refuse" or "should ask first"
- low No test case covers injection arriving through data
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- -273 emoji in the instructions: noise for the model
- -31 of 2 scripts are never mentioned in SKILL.md
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 185: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 26 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 24 items
- +4Has examples (11 code blocks)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 67.