BF dedao-thinking-skills
得到大脑会员式的 6 合 1 文本与思考技能包,把'怎么用 AI 帮人想清楚、写清楚'拆成 6 个边界清晰的模式:润色、点评、拷问、回顾、创作、发芽。每个模式只解决一个问题,规则和禁忌都画得明明白白。当用户想要——把口语/草稿写通顺(润色)、识别自己没意识到的亮点(点评)、用直友姿态质疑方案/观点找漏洞(拷问/批判性审视)、从散乱记录里发现模式和盲区(回顾/复盘)、把想法变成小红书/公众号/朋友圈等具体内容(创作)、把一条想法跨界联想撞出新知(发芽/发散)——就使用本技能。即使用户没说'用 XX 模式',只要意图落在上述六类(包括'帮我看看这段写得好不好''这段话帮我顺一下''这个方案靠谱吗''帮我把这几条记录串一串看看''帮我把这个想法写成小红书''这条笔记发散一下'),都应触发并按下表路由到对应模式。
得到大脑会员式的 6 合 1 文本与思考技能包,把'怎么用 AI 帮人想清楚、写清楚'拆成 6…
As a process F 33/100 · Will not run — References files that are not bundled: references/polish.md, references/comment.md, references/interrogate.md
How to improve
- Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
- The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 9. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
description-no-whendescription does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when") - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: references/polish.md - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: references/comment.md - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: references/interrogate.md - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: references/review.md - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: references/create.md - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: references/sprout.md
Process rating: all ten parameters 33/100
- 0Tools and files. 6 referenced file(s) missing: references/polish.md, references/comment.md, references/interrogate.md
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 30Running it twice. 1 mutating operations with no state check
- 100Steps. 18 steps
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 495 tokens
- medium 10 test cases, all positive: not one "should refuse" or "should ask first"
- low No test case covers injection arriving through data
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- +4No input/output examples
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 357: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 7 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 18 items
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 56.