SKILLEMALL.ai

BD 1688-ai-message-push

1688 AI 消息推送 Skill —— 向当前用户自己推送通知,支持微信通知和 APP 系统通知两种渠道。 核心工具能力:微信通知推送(发给自己)、APP 系统通知推送(发给自己)。 触发词:微信通知、发微信、微信推送、APP通知、系统通知、APP推送。

ClawHub Agent Skills author: 1688AiInfra v0.8.0 MIT-0 22 files body ≈ 630 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 3 d ago

1688 AI 消息推送 Skill —— 向当前用户自己推送通知,支持微信通知和 APP 系统通知两种渠道。 核心工具能力:微信通知推送(发给自己)、APP 系统通知推送(发给自己)。 触发词:微信通知、发微信、微信推送、APP通知、系统通知、APP推送。

As a process D 43/100 · Unfinished process — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

ProcedureInfrastructuretype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
B
84/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
61
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
D
43/100
Unfinished process
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 22. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")

Process rating: all ten parameters 43/100

  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 30Running it twice. 1 mutating operations with no state check
  • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (python) that frontmatter does not declare
  • 100Steps. 17 steps
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 630 tokens

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • +4No input/output examples
  • -41 reference files, but SKILL.md never points to them: the model will not open them
  • -35 of 6 scripts are never mentioned in SKILL.md
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 129: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 9 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 17 items

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 61.

External checks

ClawHub: suspicious
The skill mostly matches a notification tool, but it also handles and persists API keys in a mismatched cross-skill configuration path and contains misleading DingTalk setup references.
LLM: suspicious (high) · 4 Sept 2026