SKILLEMALL.ai

BC 1688-item-title-optimizer

1688商品标题优化 工具能力:为商品标题添加热词优化(快速、基于规则)和 LLM 深度重写(高质量、自然流畅),支持用户输入偏好。如果用户没有选择想优化标题的商品,技能中可以出组件让用户选择; 触发词:优化标题、标题优化、改标题、重写标题、商品标题、标题改写、分析标题、我要优化标题、标题里哪些词没用、标题里应该加哪些热搜关键词、我的商品标题怎么优化?、我的标题怎么优化?、我要优化商品标题

ClawHub Agent Skills author: 1688AiInfra v0.83.0 MIT-0 38 files body ≈ 3 203 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 3 d ago

As a process C 53/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

ProcedureAI and agentsInfrastructuretype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
B
88/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
71
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
53/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 38. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")

Process rating: all ten parameters 53/100

  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
  • 100Steps. 109 steps
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 3203 tokens
  • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
  • low 14 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • -231 emoji in the instructions: noise for the model
  • -36 of 7 scripts are never mentioned in SKILL.md
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 196: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 25 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 109 items
  • +4Has examples (9 code blocks)
  • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (1 of 4)

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 71.

External checks

ClawHub: suspicious
The skill mostly matches its title-optimization purpose, but it defaults to processing every bound shop and contains conflicting fallback instructions for user title selection.
LLM: suspicious (high) · 4 Sept 2026