BF arxiv-paper-writer
Use this skill whenever the user wants Claude Code to write, scaffold, compile, debug, or review an arXiv-style academic paper, especially survey papers with LaTeX, BibTeX citations, TikZ figures, tables, and PDF output. This skill should trigger for requests like writing a full paper, creating an arXiv paper project, turning a research topic into a LaTeX manuscript, reproducing the Paper-Write-Skill-Test agent-survey workflow, or setting up a Windows/Linux Claude Code paper-writing loop.
As a process F 55/100 · Will not run — References files that are not bundled: templates/arxiv_survey_main.tex, templates/full_survey_main.tex, templates/agent_survey_references.bib
How to improve
- The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 15. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: templates/arxiv_survey_main.tex - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: templates/full_survey_main.tex - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: templates/agent_survey_references.bib - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: templates/agent_survey_figures_tables.tex
Process rating: all ten parameters 55/100
- 0Tools and files. 4 referenced file(s) missing: templates/arxiv_survey_main.tex, templates/full_survey_main.tex, templates/agent_survey_references.bib
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 30Running it twice. 5 mutating operations with no state check
- 55Failures and branches. 1 branches
- 60Result and completion. Output format stated, no completion criterion
- 70When it triggers. States when to use, but not when not to
- 100Steps. 12 steps
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 881 tokens
- 100Progress reporting. Reports progress
- medium 4 test cases, all positive: not one "should refuse" or "should ask first"
- low No test case covers injection arriving through data
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +4No input/output examples
- -33 of 3 scripts are never mentioned in SKILL.md
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 493: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 13 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 12 items
- +3Output format is stated explicitly
- +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (8 of 8)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 72.