SKILLEMALL.ai

AD Mapping-Skill

AI/ML 人才搜索、论文作者发现、实验室成员爬取、GitHub 研究者挖掘与个性化招聘邮件生成 skill。只要用户提到查找 AI/ML PhD、研究员、工程师,抓取实验室成员、OpenReview/CVF 会议作者、GitHub 网络研究者,提取主页/Scholar/GitHub/邮箱/研究方向,识别华人、分类去重,或把结果导入飞书多维表格并批量生成邮件,就应该优先使用这个 skill;即使用户没有明确说“使用 Mapping-Skill”,只要任务属于这些复合工作流,也应触发。

ClawHub Agent Skills author: 16Miku v2.0.1 MIT-0 28 files body ≈ 2 013 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 3 d ago

As a process D 46/100 · Unfinished process — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

ProcedureGitHubInfrastructuretype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
A
90/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
74
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
D
46/100
Unfinished process
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 27. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning name-format name should be kebab-case (lowercase letters, digits, hyphens)
  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")

Process rating: all ten parameters 46/100

  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (python) that frontmatter does not declare
  • 100Steps. 111 steps
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 2013 tokens
  • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
  • low 12 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill
  • medium 3 test cases, all positive: not one "should refuse" or "should ask first"

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 244: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 30 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 111 items
  • +4Has examples (5 code blocks)
  • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (15 of 16)
  • +3All 7 scripts are documented

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 74.

External checks

ClawHub: suspicious
This skill is a disclosed recruiting scraper, but it enables broad personal-data harvesting, ethnicity inference, and bulk outreach workflows without enough user controls or privacy guardrails.
LLM: suspicious (high) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026