SKILLEMALL.ai

CF smyx-child-emotion-recognition-analysis

Using fixed cameras (and optional microphones) at home or in kindergartens, AI multimodal analysis recognizes a child's facial expressions (eyebrow/eye shape, mouth-corner curvature), cry-sound features (pitch, frequency, duration), and body-motion amplitude (waving, stomping, curling up) in real time, and jointly identifies the child's typical emotional state: happy, sad, angry, fearful, etc. | 通过家庭或幼儿园内的固定摄像头(及可选麦克风),利用AI多模态分析技术实时分析儿童的面部表情(如眉眼形态、嘴角弧度)、哭声音频特征(音调、频率、持续时间)以及肢体动作幅度(挥手、跺脚、蜷缩等),综合识别出儿童当前的典型情绪状态:快乐、悲伤、愤怒、恐惧等。

ClawHub Agent Skills author: smyx-skills v1.0.30 MIT-0 30 files · 18 scripts body ≈ 1 571 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai↗ analyzed 8 d ago

Using fixed cameras (and optional microphones) at home or in kindergartens, AI multimodal analysis recognizes a child's facial expressions (eyebrow/eye shape…

As a process F 32/100 · No process to follow — weak spots: steps, result and completion, when it triggers

AnalyzerSoftware developmenttype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
C
88/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
69
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
F
32/100
No process to follow
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 30. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")

Process rating: all ten parameters 32/100

  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 21Steps. 1 steps, 1 vague phrases
  • 30Running it twice. 1 mutating operations with no state check
  • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (web, python) that frontmatter does not declare
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1571 tokens

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3No numbered steps or checklist
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • -255 emoji in the instructions: noise for the model
  • -32 of 4 scripts are never mentioned in SKILL.md
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 526: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 19 headings
  • +4Has examples (3 code blocks)
  • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (1 of 1)
  • +1License stated

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 69.

External checks

ClawHub: suspicious
The skill is mostly coherent as a cloud child-emotion analysis tool, but it silently creates/reuses identities, stores tokens, and retrieves sensitive child history with too little user control.
LLM: suspicious (high) · 30 Sept 2026