SKILLEMALL.ai

BF smyx-child-happy-moment-capture-analysis

Using fixed cameras at home, kindergartens, or playgrounds, the system analyzes children's behavior and expressions in real time to identify happy moments: big laughter (mouth corners sharply raised, eyes squinted into crescents, teeth showing), jumping (both feet off the ground), clapping (rhythmic hand clapping), and joyful reactions to praise or rewards. | 通过家庭、幼儿园或游乐场的固定摄像头,实时分析儿童的行为和表情,识别开心瞬间:大笑(面部表情:嘴角大幅度上翘、眼睛眯成月牙、露出牙齿)、蹦跳(双脚离地跳跃)、拍手(双手有节奏地拍击)、以及接收到表扬或奖励时的愉悦反应。当检测到开心事件时,自动抓拍高清图片或短视频(前后2秒),生成'开心日记'推送至家长手机APP,并播放鼓励音效(如'你真棒!

ClawHub Agent Skills author: smyx-skills v1.0.10 MIT-0 30 files body ≈ 1 953 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 2 d ago

Using fixed cameras at home, kindergartens, or playgrounds, the system analyzes children's behavior and expressions in real time to identify happy moments…

As a process F 32/100 · Will not run — weak spots: steps, result and completion, when it triggers

AnalyzerSoftware developmenttype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
B
88/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
69
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
F
32/100
Will not run
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 30. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")

Process rating: all ten parameters 32/100

  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 25Steps. 1 steps
  • 30Running it twice. 1 mutating operations with no state check
  • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (python) that frontmatter does not declare
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1953 tokens

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3No numbered steps or checklist
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • -263 emoji in the instructions: noise for the model
  • -32 of 4 scripts are never mentioned in SKILL.md
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 533: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 19 headings
  • +4Has examples (3 code blocks)
  • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (1 of 1)
  • +1License stated

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 69.

External checks

ClawHub: suspicious
The skill is mostly aligned with child happy-moment capture, but it handles sensitive child video, cloud history, hidden identity setup, and local token persistence with too little user control.
LLM: suspicious (high) · 29 Aug 2026