SKILLEMALL.ai

BF smyx-fish-flashing-scraping-detection-analysis

Through fixed aquarium cameras, the system analyzes fish behavior videos and detects abnormal frictional actions between fish bodies and tank walls, substrate, or rockwork — 'flashing' (fish flipping sideways and brushing tank walls rapidly) and 'scraping' (fish belly/flank rubbing on substrate). The system counts abnormal contact frequency per minute. | 通过鱼缸固定摄像头,分析鱼类的行为视频,检测鱼体与缸壁、底砂、造景石等物体的异常摩擦动作(擦缸:鱼体侧身快速蹭过缸壁;蹭底:鱼体腹部或侧面贴底砂摩擦)。统计每分钟的异常接触频次,当频次超过阈值(默认 5 次/分钟)且持续时间超过 10 秒时,输出'外寄风险提示',提醒用户检查是否有寄生虫(如小瓜虫、车轮虫、三代虫)感染或皮肤不适。

ClawHub Agent Skills author: smyx-skills v1.0.11 MIT-0 30 files body ≈ 2 411 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 2 d ago

Through fixed aquarium cameras, the system analyzes fish behavior videos and detects abnormal frictional actions between fish bodies and tank walls…

As a process F 32/100 · Will not run — weak spots: steps, result and completion, when it triggers

AnalyzerMedia and videoSoftware developmenttype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
B
88/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
69
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
F
32/100
Will not run
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 30. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")

Process rating: all ten parameters 32/100

  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 25Steps. 1 steps
  • 30Running it twice. 1 mutating operations with no state check
  • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (python) that frontmatter does not declare
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 2411 tokens

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3No numbered steps or checklist
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • -277 emoji in the instructions: noise for the model
  • -32 of 4 scripts are never mentioned in SKILL.md
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 523: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 19 headings
  • +4Has examples (3 code blocks)
  • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (1 of 1)
  • +1License stated

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 69.

External checks

ClawHub: suspicious
This fish-video analysis skill has a coherent core purpose, but it silently creates and reuses identities, stores tokens locally, and can send media and credentials through unsafe or overbroad network paths.
LLM: suspicious (high) · 8 Sept 2026