SKILLEMALL.ai

BD smyx-fish-surface-symptom-detection-analysis

Through fixed cameras on aquariums or underwater cameras capturing high-definition fish images, the system uses AI vision analysis to detect abnormal symptoms on the fish body surface: white-spot disease (white spots of about 0.5-1mm in diameter, salt-grain like), hyperemia (red blood streaks or patches on skin or fin bases), and fin-rot (tail-fin edges turning white, ragged or rotting). | 通过鱼缸固定摄像头或水下摄像头拍摄鱼类高清图像,利用 AI 视觉分析技术检测鱼体表面的异常症状:白点病(白色点状物,直径约 0.5-1mm,类似盐粒)、充血(皮肤或鳍条基部出现红色血丝或斑块)、烂尾(尾鳍边缘发白、残缺、腐烂)。该技能有助于早期发现观赏鱼常见疾病,指导用户采取隔离、升温、用药(用药请咨询专业水族兽医)等措施。

ClawHub Agent Skills author: smyx-skills v1.0.10 MIT-0 30 files body ≈ 2 154 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 28 h ago

Through fixed cameras on aquariums or underwater cameras capturing high-definition fish images, the system uses AI vision analysis to detect abnormal symptoms…

As a process D 35/100 · Unfinished process — weak spots: steps, result and completion, when it triggers

AnalyzerSoftware developmenttype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
B
88/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
69
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
D
35/100
Unfinished process
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 30. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")

Process rating: all ten parameters 35/100

  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 25Steps. 1 steps
  • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (python) that frontmatter does not declare
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 2154 tokens
  • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3No numbered steps or checklist
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • -269 emoji in the instructions: noise for the model
  • -32 of 4 scripts are never mentioned in SKILL.md
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 556: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 19 headings
  • +4Has examples (3 code blocks)
  • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (1 of 1)
  • +1License stated

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 69.

External checks

ClawHub: suspicious
This fish-analysis skill is not clearly malicious, but it needs Review because it silently manages identity, stores tokens locally, and is configured to use private development HTTP endpoints.
LLM: suspicious (high) · 29 Aug 2026