SKILLEMALL.ai

AD smyx-grooming-effectiveness-analysis

Triggers when a user provides a pet grooming area video or image URL/file for analysis; supports local uploads or network URLs to call server-side APIs for coat condition and shed hair recognition, detecting matting area ratio and shed hair volume to output hairball risk level, helping prevent hairball syndrome. Application scenarios: smart grooming tools, long-haired pet care, pet health management. | 当用户提供梳毛器区域的视频/图像URL或文件时,触发本技能进行毛发表面状态分析;支持通过上传本地视频/图片或网络URL,调用服务端API进行识别,检测打结面积占比、梳下毛发量(堆积面积),输出毛球风险等级,帮助预防毛球症。应用场景:智能梳毛器、长毛宠物护理、宠物健康管理。

ClawHub Agent Skills author: smyx-skills v1.0.11 MIT-0 30 files body ≈ 1 555 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 3 d ago

As a process D 41/100 · Unfinished process — weak spots: steps, result and completion, inputs and preconditions

AnalyzerInfrastructureMedia and videotype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
A
92/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
81
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
D
41/100
Unfinished process
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 30. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 41/100

    • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 25Steps. 1 steps
    • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (python) that frontmatter does not declare
    • 70When it triggers. States when to use, but not when not to
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1555 tokens
    • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
    • low 11 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +3No numbered steps or checklist
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • -263 emoji in the instructions: noise for the model
    • -32 of 4 scripts are never mentioned in SKILL.md
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +3Description length 542: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 21 headings
    • +4Has examples (3 code blocks)
    • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (1 of 1)
    • +1License stated

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 81.

    External checks

    ClawHub: suspicious
    This skill mostly matches its advertised pet grooming analysis purpose, but it automatically handles persistent identity and tokens and is packaged to send sensitive traffic through plaintext development endpoints.
    LLM: suspicious (high) · 9 Sept 2026