SKILLEMALL.ai

AD smyx-pet-stool-morphology-recognition-analysis

Triggers when a user provides an image/video URL or file of dog toilet area or outdoor dog-walking path for analysis; supports local uploads or network URLs to call server-side APIs for pet stool morphology recognition, analyzing stool color (brown, black, red, white), shape (formed, loose/soft, watery, granular hard), and the presence of blood or mucus, outputting standardized abnormal observation features to help early discovery of gastrointestinal diseases (without diagnosing diseases). Application scenarios: dog toilets, outdoor dog-walking path cameras, pet health monitoring, multi-pet households. | 当用户提供狗厕所或户外遛狗路径区域的粪便图像/视频时,触发本技能进行排便形态识别分析;支持通过上传本地文件或网络URL,调用服务端API识别粪便颜色(棕、黑、红、白)、形状(条状、稀糊、颗粒)、是否带血或粘液,输出异常特征观察结果,帮助早期发现肠胃疾病(不诊断疾病)。应用场景:狗厕所、遛狗路径摄像头、宠物健康监测、多宠家庭。

ClawHub Agent Skills author: smyx-skills v1.0.5 MIT-0 30 files body ≈ 1 411 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 3 d ago

As a process D 41/100 · Unfinished process — weak spots: steps, result and completion, inputs and preconditions

AnalyzerInfrastructuretype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
A
92/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
81
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
D
41/100
Unfinished process
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 30. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 41/100

    • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 25Steps. 1 steps
    • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (python) that frontmatter does not declare
    • 70When it triggers. States when to use, but not when not to
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1411 tokens
    • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +3No numbered steps or checklist
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • -254 emoji in the instructions: noise for the model
    • -32 of 4 scripts are never mentioned in SKILL.md
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +3Description length 775: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 19 headings
    • +4Has examples (3 code blocks)
    • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (1 of 1)
    • +1License stated

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 81.

    External checks

    ClawHub: suspicious
    The skill does the advertised pet stool media analysis, but it also silently creates or reuses an account identity, stores tokens locally, uploads media or submitted URLs to configured services, and can query cloud history reports.
    LLM: suspicious (high) · 1 Sept 2026