SKILLEMALL.ai

AD smyx-pet-training-command-execution-analysis

Triggers when a user provides a training-area video of a pet for analysis; supports local uploads or network URLs to call server-side APIs for command-execution recognition, detecting whether the pet's body posture matches the issued commands (Sit / Down / Stay), comparing posture timing against command timestamps, and judging execution success. When the command is not executed, the result can trigger an external voice repeat-prompt signal (not a medical / behavior-therapy advice). Application scenarios: smart dog-training devices, remote pet training, behavior correction. | 当用户提供训练区域视频时,触发本技能进行姿态-指令匹配分析;支持通过上传本地视频或网络视频URL,调用服务端API检测宠物身体姿态是否符合“坐/卧/等”指令标准,对比指令发出时间,判断是否执行成功;未执行时可由外部设备触发声控重复提示信号(不提供疾病诊断或行为治疗方案)。应用场景:智能训狗设备、宠物远程训练、行为矫正。

ClawHub Agent Skills author: smyx-skills v1.0.11 MIT-0 31 files body ≈ 1 575 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 3 d ago

As a process D 41/100 · Unfinished process — weak spots: steps, result and completion, inputs and preconditions

AnalyzerMedia and videoInfrastructureAI and agentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
A
92/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
81
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
D
41/100
Unfinished process
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 31. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 41/100

    • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 25Steps. 1 steps
    • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (python) that frontmatter does not declare
    • 70When it triggers. States when to use, but not when not to
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1575 tokens
    • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
    • low 10 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +3No numbered steps or checklist
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • -259 emoji in the instructions: noise for the model
    • -32 of 4 scripts are never mentioned in SKILL.md
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +3Description length 742: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 20 headings
    • +4Has examples (3 code blocks)
    • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (1 of 1)
    • +1License stated

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 81.

    External checks

    ClawHub: suspicious
    The skill’s pet-video analysis purpose is plausible, but it silently creates or reuses an identity, sends media and identity data to cloud APIs that may default to HTTP development endpoints, and stores tokens locally.
    LLM: suspicious (high) · 7 Sept 2026