SKILLEMALL.ai

BD smyx-plant-wilting-quantification-analysis

AI-powered plant wilting quantification from full-plant images via smart pots or fixed cameras. Detects leaf-stem angle (leaf droop), stem straightness, and leaf turgidity to quantify wilting severity (0-100%). Optionally fuses soil-moisture sensor data to discriminate dehydration (underwatering) vs. waterlogging (root hypoxia), and auto-triggers watering or drainage prompts for precision irrigation. Scenarios: smart pots, home gardening, greenhouses, plant factories. | 通过智能花盆或固定摄像头拍摄植物整体图像,利用AI视觉分析技术检测叶片与茎秆的夹角(叶片下垂角度)、茎秆挺直程度以及叶片舒展度,量化萎蔫程度(0-100%)。可选结合土壤湿度传感器数据,综合判断萎蔫原因是缺水还是水涝(根部缺氧导致)。可自动触发灌溉或排水提示,帮助用户精准浇水。应用场景:智能花盆、家庭园艺、温室大棚、植物工厂。

ClawHub Agent Skills author: smyx-skills v1.0.13 MIT-0 30 files body ≈ 1 613 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 3 d ago

As a process D 35/100 · Unfinished process — weak spots: steps, result and completion, when it triggers

AnalyzerInfrastructureAI and agentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
B
88/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
69
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
D
35/100
Unfinished process
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 30. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")

Process rating: all ten parameters 35/100

  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 25Steps. 1 steps
  • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (python) that frontmatter does not declare
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1613 tokens
  • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
  • low 13 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3No numbered steps or checklist
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • -270 emoji in the instructions: noise for the model
  • -32 of 4 scripts are never mentioned in SKILL.md
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 639: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 23 headings
  • +4Has examples (3 code blocks)
  • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (1 of 1)
  • +1License stated

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 69.

External checks

ClawHub: suspicious
This plant-analysis skill performs the expected cloud media analysis, but it also silently creates or reuses an external identity and stores authentication tokens locally.
LLM: suspicious (high) · 23 Aug 2026