SKILLEMALL.ai

BD smyx-reptile-shedding-progress-analysis

Through a fixed camera in the reptile enclosure, the system periodically captures full-body high-definition images of reptiles (snakes, lizards, geckos) and uses AI visual analysis to detect changes in body colour (normal vivid → dull/whitish → restored vivid) and eye state (clear → opaque milky 'blue-phase' → clear again), to determine the shedding phase: preparation phase (skin turns whitish, eyes turn opaque), in-progress. | 通过爬宠箱固定摄像头,定期拍摄爬行动物(如蛇、蜥蜴、守宫)的全身高清图像,利用 AI 视觉分析技术检测体表颜色变化(正常体色 → 发白/灰白 → 恢复鲜艳)以及眼部状态(透明 → 浑浊灰白 → 再次透明),判断蜕皮阶段:准备期(皮肤发白、眼睛浑浊)、进行期(头部或局部开始蜕皮)、完成期(旧皮完全脱离,体色恢复)。系统每日或每半日自动分析,输出蜕皮阶段及护理建议。

ClawHub Agent Skills author: smyx-skills v1.0.11 MIT-0 30 files body ≈ 2 771 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 3 d ago

Through a fixed camera in the reptile enclosure, the system periodically captures full-body high-definition images of reptiles (snakes, lizards, geckos) and…

As a process D 35/100 · Unfinished process — weak spots: steps, result and completion, when it triggers

AnalyzerSoftware developmenttype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
B
88/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
69
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
D
35/100
Unfinished process
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 30. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")

Process rating: all ten parameters 35/100

  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 25Steps. 1 steps
  • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (python) that frontmatter does not declare
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 2771 tokens
  • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3No numbered steps or checklist
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • -286 emoji in the instructions: noise for the model
  • -32 of 4 scripts are never mentioned in SKILL.md
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 614: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 19 headings
  • +4Has examples (3 code blocks)
  • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (1 of 1)
  • +1License stated

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 69.

External checks

ClawHub: suspicious
This skill has a coherent reptile-shedding analysis purpose, but it also silently creates or reuses identities, uploads media to remote services, and stores or sends tokens in ways that need review before installation.
LLM: suspicious (high) · 8 Sept 2026