SKILLEMALL.ai

BD smyx-vomiting-regurgitation-detection-analysis

AI-powered pet vomiting and regurgitation detection from indoor fixed-camera video. Identifies rhythmic abdominal contractions, head-forward extension, and mouth opening actions, plus detects vomitus on the floor (food, hairball, bile). Records event time, frequency, and vomitus characteristics for early digestive issue discovery. Scenarios: daily home health monitoring, multi-pet households, senior pet care, animal hospital inpatient observation. | 通过室内固定摄像头分析宠物活动区域的连续视频,利用动作识别技术检测宠物的呕吐或反流行为(包括腹部节律性收缩、口部张合、头部前伸等典型动作),同时识别地面是否出现呕吐物(食物残渣、毛球、黄色胆汁等),记录发生时间、频次以及呕吐物特征。有助于主人及早发现宠物的消化系统问题,避免延误治疗。应用场景:宠物家庭日常健康监护、多宠家庭、老年宠物护理、宠物医院住院观察。

ClawHub Agent Skills author: smyx-skills v1.0.11 MIT-0 30 files body ≈ 1 623 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 4 d ago

As a process D 35/100 · Unfinished process — weak spots: steps, result and completion, when it triggers

AnalyzerInfrastructureMedia and videotype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
B
88/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
69
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
D
35/100
Unfinished process
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 30. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")

Process rating: all ten parameters 35/100

  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 25Steps. 1 steps
  • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (python) that frontmatter does not declare
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1623 tokens
  • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
  • low 13 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3No numbered steps or checklist
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • -273 emoji in the instructions: noise for the model
  • -32 of 4 scripts are never mentioned in SKILL.md
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 633: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 23 headings
  • +4Has examples (3 code blocks)
  • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (1 of 1)
  • +1License stated

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 69.

External checks

ClawHub: suspicious
This skill performs the advertised pet video analysis, but it also uses automatic identity handling and a default development HTTP configuration that can expose private video, account identifiers, and tokens.
LLM: suspicious (high) · 9 Sept 2026