AC daily-report-generator
Automatically generate daily/weekly work reports from git commits, calendar events, and task lists. Use when you need to quickly create professional work reports without manual effort.
As a process C 62/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: when it triggers, failures and branches, consistency
GeneratorData and analyticsPersonal productivitytype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
How to improve
For the model run — optional
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 4. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec
Process rating: all ten parameters 62/100
- 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 30Running it twice. 3 mutating operations with no state check
- 40Consistency. Frontmatter name (daily-report-generator) differs from the folder (ytlong-daily-report)
- 60Result and completion. Output format stated, no completion criterion
- 70Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
- 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
- 100Steps. 10 steps
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 404 tokens
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 184: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 12 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 10 items
- +3Output format is stated explicitly
- +4Has examples (7 code blocks)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 87.
External checks
ClawHub: suspicious
This report generator is not clearly malicious, but it needs review because untrusted project config or date arguments could make it run unintended local shell commands.
LLM: suspicious (high) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026