SKILLEMALL.ai

AC 1ly-payments

Agent-native payments via 1ly MCP. Use when the user needs x402 payment handling, to accept USDC for APIs/services, to pay for paid APIs, to create stores or paid links, need payment gateway for agents or to run agent-to-agent paid workflows. Supports Solana and Base. Capabilities include accepting USDC, marketplace search, paid API calls with auto-payment, store/link creation, stats, key management, and token launch, trade and fee-claim on Bags.fm.

ClawHub Agent Skills author: 1lystore v1.0.4 2 files body ≈ 2 613 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 3 d ago

As a process C 59/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, inputs and preconditions, running it twice

IntegrationAI and agentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
A
94/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
84
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
59/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Running it twice w 4
30
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 2. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 59/100

    • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 30Running it twice. 11 mutating operations with no state check
    • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (web) that frontmatter does not declare
    • 70When it triggers. States when to use, but not when not to
    • 85Steps. 109 steps, 1 vague phrases
    • 100Failures and branches. 7 branches, has a failure section
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 2613 tokens
    • 100Progress reporting. Reports progress
    • medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing
    • low 18 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +3Description length 453: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 23 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 109 items
    • +4Has examples (5 code blocks)

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 84.

    External checks

    ClawHub: suspicious
    This payment skill is coherent but needs Review because it can use raw wallet keys, persist seller credentials, and perform high-impact financial/account changes without clear per-action confirmation boundaries.
    LLM: suspicious (high) · VirusTotal: suspicious · 10 Sept 2026