AC skill-feedback-collector
Human-in-the-loop MCP feedback collector with task queue. Pauses to collect human input via browser UI before continuing. Use when completing tasks, encountering uncertain parameters, needing user confirmation, working with coding plan subscriptions, or when you should ask instead of guess. Also covers batch task execution via auto-dequeue.
As a process C 57/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, inputs and preconditions, running it twice
How to improve
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 5
✓ No critical or high findings
Medium and low: 5
-
low Secrets in code
secret-high-entropy-tokenpackage-lock.json:92High-entropy token-like string (may be an id, hash or a credential) (detector / deny-list definition)"integrity": "sha5…GLi+2W/6ao+6Y7gu/RCwR…Kng==",
detector -
low Secrets in code
secret-high-entropy-tokenpackage-lock.json:258High-entropy token-like string (may be an id, hash or a credential) (detector / deny-list definition)"integrity": "sha5…GLw+xYSd…cqA==",
detector -
low Secrets in code
secret-high-entropy-tokenpackage-lock.json:308High-entropy token-like string (may be an id, hash or a credential) (detector / deny-list definition)"integrity": "sha5…FrF+LTRo…W3g==",
detector -
low Secrets in code
secret-high-entropy-tokenpackage-lock.json:316High-entropy token-like string (may be an id, hash or a credential) (detector / deny-list definition)"integrity": "sha5…A6j+hAmM…GbS+kf5c…csw==",
detector -
low Secrets in code
secret-high-entropy-tokenpackage-lock.json:324High-entropy token-like string (may be an id, hash or a credential) (detector / deny-list definition)"integrity": "sha5…5bm+c2gQ…aG5+esrLODihIorn+Pe6F…dXA==",
detector
Files scanned: 8. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec
Process rating: all ten parameters 57/100
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 30Running it twice. 6 mutating operations with no state check
- 60Tools and files. Uses tools (bash) that frontmatter does not declare
- 70When it triggers. States when to use, but not when not to
- 85Steps. 25 steps, 1 vague phrases
- 100Failures and branches. 1 branches, has a failure section
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1102 tokens
- medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 342: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 11 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 25 items
- +4Has examples (4 code blocks)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 84.